If you had even the slightest clue then you'd know this was on the front page which was how I found it. But of course, jumping to conclusions yet again.
As for talent? No. Her face is extremely unappealing so she can't model for one. Courtesy? Her naked body is on the internet, so no. Looks? Again, her face..and her bush is more dense than a neutron star. Not to mention that tattoo right there isn't very tasteful. Her brows have too much of an arch and makes her look like a teenage latina gangster. Her hair also looks as though it hasn't seen water in a long while. Teeth could use a good whitening. And our breasts are the same size. So. .
There are only a couple nudes out of hundreds submitted each day that make the home page. So your augment is flawed. Each category has the opportunity to make the home page. I looked at your work. You will never have to deal with snarky comments from people who are jealous because your work is on the home page and there's is not.
Not sure why 'augment' is in where I assume you meant argument either. I love how everybody who disagrees with me goes to my page and looks at my stats to try and either make a petty insult or a petty comparison. Oh and back to "UR jus jealouz" She doesn't have anything I don't. If I wanted nude photos of myself, I'd have my boyfriend take them, he's a much better photographer too.
I don't care if my work is never on the front page. I'm not that petty I'm just happy to have the group of people I do have who appreciate my work and will remember it rather than just fave/comment and forget it even exists
Back to your main "Argument" then you are right it would not have made it to the front page if she were not nude because it was in the artistic nudes category which happens to be a part of this site. You are actually quite petty because you post negative comments on a popular picture because you don't like it because it is a nude. Do you do the same for the other categories?
I see in your fit of rage you forgot to address the POINT of our exchange after your petty jab.
No shit DA has an Artistic Nudes section. Though it's pretty abused. I was just making a point about how naked woman bump stats because of the high amount of perverts and shallow users and not because the photo is particularly well done.
Way to jump to conclusions XD I don't not like it because the woman is nude. I dislike it because the background is over exposed, the subject is blurry, and the composition is crooked. She's not making a particularly attractive face either. Her head should be tilted down a little more to open up her eyes a little.
if you wanna poopoo nudes, then at least poopoo the dozens and dozens of daily posted HORRIBLE ones, shot by disgusting people at home with their friggin cell phones...normally fat 50 yr old men playing with their dicks and letting the world enjoy the beauty...START WITH THEM haha...thats all i gotta say to the haters. then there's 100s of more faux photogs...at least Scott is real, whether he is your cup of tea or not.