Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
July 1, 2012
Image Size
1.0 MB
Resolution
2030×3045
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
6,631 (1 today)
Favourites
122 (who?)
Comments
8
Downloads
601

Camera Data

Make
Canon
Model
Canon EOS 50D
Shutter Speed
1/128 second
Aperture
F/1.8
Focal Length
50 mm
ISO Speed
100
Date Taken
May 20, 2012, 6:19:15 PM
Software
Aperture 3.2.4
Sensor Size
9mm
×
Jackie 999 by Scottworldwide Jackie 999 by Scottworldwide
:iconatsd1::iconatsd2::iconatsd3:
Add a Comment:
 
:iconfrasavonarola:
FraSavonarola Featured By Owner Dec 19, 2012
She flees, but I run faster... :-)
Reply
:iconemerson-fialho:
Emerson-Fialho Featured By Owner Jul 3, 2012  Professional Artist
Nice shot, excellent, my friend!
Reply
:iconperezart:
PerezArt Featured By Owner Jul 2, 2012
She looks like a beautiful nymph running thru the forest
Reply
:iconscottellington:
ScottEllington Featured By Owner Jul 2, 2012
I think you've broken more rules than I know, and torn the cover off the ball, engagingly, creatively, brilliantly.
Reply
:iconscottworldwide:
Scottworldwide Featured By Owner Jul 2, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
Thank you! Nice to hear from you again.
Reply
:iconscottellington:
ScottEllington Featured By Owner Jul 2, 2012
I'm cutting back on blithering, but -- wide open, slow shutter, minimum amplification, pan with sun-in-frame, fill flash(?)...
You sacrificed studio control and gained a ton of poetic tension in an unlimited number of viewer-defined narratives.
Grand Slam!
Subtly expanding the vocabulary of glamourgrams is a very big deal.
(I'm just trying to make less noise.)
Reply
:iconscottworldwide:
Scottworldwide Featured By Owner Jul 2, 2012  Hobbyist Photographer
I am glad you like it. Though I must fess up the depth of field is real but it was kind of an overcast day. So I dropped the gamma added yellow filter and the lens flare. Which is how the lens could be wide open and the relatively slow shutter speed. I guess I could have done that at 1/2000 on a sunny day. but you shoot what you got. I will say though that Trishii 2 and 2 is better from my gallery are real lens flare and in no way retouched other than spotting. I generally only use Photoshop for clean up and general color tweaks.

Thanks for looking and it is good to hear from you.
Reply
:iconscottellington:
ScottEllington Featured By Owner Jul 2, 2012
Jackie 5.1 highlights the variable I find most delicious (after Jackie, herself, of course); motion/action, meaningful, purposive physical activity.
Trishii 2 succeeds in the presence of challenging conditions, but Jackie 999, I think, is qualitatively different (even from photographs that celebrate dance.
It infuses the static vernacular of glamour with the kind of realworld vitality that's usually missing; and it brings inventive glamour to a neglected field of weeds, at level of scrutiny that's both intellectual and profoundly visceral. It's about playful and respectful participation. I think that's damned-near unique.
(So much for not blithering.)
Reply
Add a Comment: